If you like this visit the blog and bookmark it.
LOFT965
Legendary, darling…
Support Us
Loft965.com Chart – Week 27 of 2010:
- 1. Summer Day - Sheryl Crow
- 2. Forgiveness - Sarah McLachlan
- 3. Spaceship - Benny Benassi Ft. Kelis
- 4. Put Your Hands Up (If You Feel Love) - Kylie Minogue
- 5. Brave - Kelis
- 6. Say What You Want - Sheryl Crow
- 7. When I'm Alone - Lissie
- 8. Get Outta My Way - Kylie Minogue
- 9. Even Though - Morcheeba
- 10. You Lost Me - Christina Aguilera
Loft965.com
- Video Premiere: “Secret” by The Pierces
- Don’t Quote Me, Vol. 425
- Must-Watch: Alec Mapa kills on The View
- Official cover of the Gorillaz new single
- Kylie Minogue duets with Scissor Sisters on “All The Lovers”
- Cheryl Cole picture post-malaria!
- Must-Watch: Video Premiere: “Cuckoo” by Lissie
- KT Tunstall reveals new logo
- Video Premiere: “A Happy Place” by Katie Melua
- Exclusive: 5 Questions with Loft965: Rox
RSS Links
“Bionic” out now!
Kate Nash
Support SiA!
moby “wait for me”
Cyndi Lauper “Memphis Blues”
Scissor Sisters “Night Work”
Let The Music Play…
This chopped board joins with the poke under the concluded fountain.
All That’s Left To Do…
Real democracy is the way to peace and prosperity.
Many people here in the United States believe the election was certainly rigged.
I would say the majority of the people living within our borders were hoping for a democracy in IRAN. There will be no democracy in Iran until Ahmadingad
looses power over the people.
We to would like to be friends with the Iranian people but not with AHMADINGAD!
as an iranian,i’m very happy to see that other people in the world worry about us.many thanks to all of you.
Yes, you are true.
Here in Italy we are trying to reach democracy. At the moment we do not have.
What do you think of the Italian government?
Better than before? On it’s way? Corrupt?
Do you like the healthcare?
If you don’t mind my asking.
Ti piace il governo d’Italia?
Che pensi? Per favore.
I totally believe that this vote was rigged, the overall numbers are ridiculous. Unfortunately this proves nothing. As more votes are counting a percentage can easily drop.
Thank God, thank you Rachel
I knew that there was intelligent life out there…
unfortunately its not you or rachel
Percentage yes but what about the number of the votes… pay attention
Actually, how do you know the state-run TV station didn’t have it’s preliminary numbers wrong and they simply corrected the error. I’m just saying even the numbers, themselves, prove nothing.
And don’t say things like, “never heard of anything like it.” It happens every election day in the US. No weirdness, just the limits of technology.
But the number of votes are decreasing, never heard of anything like it, it was rigged, the guy and his mate the ayotoldya or whatever his handle is, are just crooks and liars, thieves, crims…the whole world knows it.
ahmedinejad and ayatollah r not liars mosavi is just angry after they lost and u david u doesnt even know what a ayatollah is so shut up!!
what planet are you from?
When a Country
such as Iran, who
will not allow journalists and T.V. cameras in and blocked all web-sites have something to hide, corruption!
The upper picture shows Rezaee with 633,048 votes at 09:47; the lower shows the same candidate with 587,913 votes at 13:53 later that day, a decrease of 45,135.”!
Don’t look at the percentage. look at the absolute number of his total votes in each picture.In the picture at the top he has 633048 votes out of 30506422 total votes.In the second picture he has 587913 votes, which is ridiculously less that the first one, out of 36477493 votes.this shows that his total number of votes has actually decreased while they counted more vote. his total vote doesn’t just shrink,unless authorities are stupid in their fraud.587913<633048 hahahahahahaaa
truethiness
Hi Rachel,
You are right about the percentage but it is about the numbers too,
in first picture it is 633048 and in the second one it is increased to 587913,
as you see it is foolish!
Hi Rachel,
You are right about the percentage but it is about the numbers too,
in first picture it is 633048 and in the second one it is decreased to 587913,
as you see it is foolish!
yes percentage makes sense, but if you look the NUMBERS dropped. Percentage makes sense…to say the more votes are read your percentage of the votes went down…yes that makes sense….but numbers going down is the issue here. Shame on them.
This report cites actual votes disappearing, not changes in percentage.
percentage ain’t the number of votes counted
The true of the matter is that the President will not let go his chair easily, he will do whatever it take to accomplish his dream of destroying Israel.
I see that here we have a misunderstanding! We’re not talking about decreasing of the percentage! What’s shown in these pictures, is a drop in the vote count that is something totally impossible!
%s can dip while counting…
If the vote is 500-500, each candidate has 50% of the 1000 votes. If one of the candidates gets the next 500 votes, that candidate will have 66.67% of the vote, vs 33.33 for the other guy.
Raw votes, however…that wouldn’t make sense.
Can someone translate the numbers?
The upper picture shows Rezaee with 633,048 votes at 09:47; the lower shows the same candidate with 587,913 votes at 13:53 later that day, a decrease of 45,135.”
Just read the whole post before you comment.
Yeah, a percentage can drop.
This is referring to the total number of votes received, dipshit!
The votes dipped, dickhead, not the percentage.
He\’s agreeing with you, fucknuts!
“As more votes are counting a percentage can easily drop.”
Too bad we’re not talking about percentage here, but numbers.
the votes could have disappeared because they were only projections to begin with (estimates based on a smaller number of votes counted), or because they were miscounted the first time. but if so, that is a very fine-grained projection, or a LOT of votes to be miscounted….
I believe that people need a logic lesson. Percentages can rise and fall but raw tallies will continuously raise as more and more votes are added to the total number of votes. Regardless of if this picture represents the number or the percentage, there still is no explanation for candidates losing in their home states.
That just does NOT happen anywhere in the world.
No need to bash an honest mistake
[...] A screenshot was posted showing Mohsen Rezaee having 633,048 votes at 09:47 and 587,913 votes at 13:53 — a decrease of 45,135 votes over a four-hour period. (h/t: loft65.com): [...]
That picture doesn’t prove it was a fraud, they can say it was a broadcasting typo. THE WHOLE SYSTEM IS A FRAUD. It’s an autocratic dictatorship masquerading as a republic. It has all the balances of a republic with ONE CHECK, that of the Ayatollah (was went from equivalent of a Catholic Father -Hojjatol Eslam- to being a POPE-Grand Ayatolla- over night)!!
Human civilizations may be headed to the eventual realization that reality is immanent, i.e. here, that the only world worth fighting for is here. People taking to the streets to effectively challenge the Supreme Leader is another step in this direction. Religion in a few hundred years, if there are no world wars, will be consigned to history books & conspiracy theorists.
Not to be a nit-picker here, but those do look like % signs in each picture. Can someone explain the rhyme or reason to this appearing to be percentages? Just to be clear, regardless of what these screenshots mean, I think the whole thing was clearly rigged. I’m just trying to make sure the information I’m getting is solid. Thanks for any insight on this.
Best to you all, we’re all thinking of you.
They are referring to the numbers below the candidates picture. The percentage is to the right, the solid vote numbers are to the bottom. These are the numbers that are going down, even as more votes are being tallied. Yes, a percent is a guess but the numbers should be the actual votes counted.
Its tough to say, there could be a lot of things at play here. I would never assume malice where incompetence will suffice. They may have just made a mistake in the counting that they then accounted for. OR, they may have been extrapolating total counts from a % received in a district. OR it may be an error by the IRINN graphic people. Aren’t they a corporation? They aren’t state owned, are they?
It’d be like assuming a messed up graphic on Fox News was indicative of vote tampering in the US. Not necessarily.
Too many factors at play.
[...] Picture that proves Iran election rigging « LOFT965. [...]
Rachel: This isn’t about a percentage dropping. It’s about vote totals dropping.
it’s not about percentage : “”633,048 votes become 587,913 for the same candidate after 4 hours”"
@MrG : The writer has already translated the numbers. The second paragraph under photo.
Why is the scrolling news marquee on the bottom in English? Is this thing legit?
Yes, they use English in their news scrolls, they think it makes them look really professional, even when they are lying through their teeth.
Everyone knows percentage can drop Mr.Smart guy
but how 633,048 votes at 09:47 become 587,913 votes after 4 hours ??
The numbers are already translated by the writer, refer to the second paragraph under the photo.
yehforgames and power leveling
Looks like BS to me. I went to translate the numbers; it went from 433038 to 587913. Someone mistranslated the 4 for a 9.
Check it yourself: http://danielschereck.com/wp2002arabia/wp-arabicnumbers.htm
The first number, 4, is very difficult to see in the screenshot, but you can tell by the slant that it is not the same as the 9 (which is clearer to see in other places in the screenshot). Unless the number was doing a bizarre wiggly-dance when the screenshot was taken, it’s more likely to be a blurred 4.
Scribbler, may be it is BS, but you should know that these are not arabic numbers, but farsi or persian numbers. Check wikipedia.
did i say they were?
I’d totally missed that, good call! Checking out the Persian numbers, it adds up right; I was mistaken. Doesn’t prove anything yet, but certainly doesn’t disprove it, either.
hmmm, not as important, but why the change in Mousavi’s photo between the two screen shots?
Anyway, I have no forensic expertise to tell anyone whether these shots have been Photoshop’d or not, but I can help by translating the numbers. These numbers are hard to read, but they do add up to the stated total, per screen shot … still doesn’t explain the drop in Rezaee’s numbers though:
@9:47am, from top to bottom:
Total votes 30,506,422 (the number above the time stamp)
A’Nejad: 19,761,433 or 64.78%
Mousavi: 9,841,056 or 32.26%
Rezaee: 633,048 or 2.08%
Karroubi: 270,885 or 0.89%
@1:53pm
Total votes: 34,377,493
A’Nejad: 21,781,391 or 63.36%
Mousavi: 11,709,391 or 34.06%
Rezaee: 587,913 or 1.71%
Karroubi: 298,798 or 0.87%
Now now, we’re all in this together. No need to get vulgar and call names.
I can’t read the writing. I saw the percentage circled, however.
If someone can translate the numbers, it would be great.
So someone at the Irinn made a typo.
Big deal.
Raw counts can drop while counting too, since reports are sometimes erroneous then corrected when official totals come in. But certainly not that much that fast — that’s pretty much prima facie evidence of manipulation.
Is it ok to repost these images on other websites? I know the government has been blocking internet sites so it would help to spread it around.
http://img526.imageshack.us/img526/1163/377pxfakeresultsiran.jpg
use this pic on forums or websites etc It has the explaination attached& a farsi numeral code at the bottom so people can confirm for themselves
What bunch of amateurs they are!!! It’s only a pathetic delayed action. They can’t keep the democracy out of Iran for long.
Read this: http://www.roozonline.com/english/news/newsitem/article/2009/june/15//shout-in-unison-there-has-been-a-coup.html
Hate to say this but this picture alone doesn’t prove anything.
If it is just an extrapolation of supposed voter behaviour, it’s quite normal absolute numbers rise and fall.
The same happened during election night in the USA and CNN broadcasting. If you could provide a bit more background on the type of news and whether these are final numbers or just exit polls, you will make a stronger case.
explain to me how 45,000 votes suddenly disappear now mr. extrapolation.
Basic stochastics. Ask 1000 people of a group of 1 million and get a statistical difference of 45. Multiplicate this by 1000 (it’s just an abstract about voter behaviour of a group of 1.000.000) you already would have the difference. It’s just an hypothetical ABSTRACT of course.
That’s why I asked for the background info in order to put this data in its right place. For other possible explanations read the comment of Mr Wordsmith.
I don’t see the proof. OK. The reported absolute numbers dropped. And if the counts were ACCURATE, they wouldn’t drop. Agreed. So what the photo PROVES (the heading of this post is “Photo that proves Iran election rigging”) is that that an inaccuracy occurred at some point.
Agreed: That “inaccuracy” may stem from rigging.
But: It can also stem from a hundred other reasons. Look at vote recounts in the United States. Even with sophisticated computers, there are variations. There are a lot more variations when some of the ballots are hand-written (as they ALL were in Iran). Or there can be transcription errors that are corrected. Or vote tabulations can be transposed on recorders’ sheets.
So I’m not contesting the likelihood of vote fraud in Iran. I’m pretty sure it occurred. Unfortunately, the photo doesn’t PROVE it. Let’s be more careful with the language we use, the proof we demand, and the conclusions we arrive at.
elections may have been rigged. i strongly believe so anyway! but that has nothing to do with the fact, that percentages may drop anytime. just think one second before posting such crap!
you are a 1st grader aren’t you
“just think one second before posting such crap!”
Are you trying to be ironic or are you just a moron?
I think another country with crooks set the pace in 2000.
I suggest you send these screens with a proper text to ambassy’s to some of europe’s countries.
perhaps the tv station made a typo?
hey, we’re all humans…
looking at the picture… even the 4th candidate dropped. So, how many human typos does it take ’til I get to the center of it? Oh, Oh
[...] 18:04 GMT: An image is now circulating that alleges to include two video captures of Iranian state-run televisi…, reporting the election results on Friday. In the image, it appears that one of the opposition [...]
[...] Picture that proves Iran election rigging « LOFT965 [...]
Anyone who has ever been involved in running an election can tell you that it is not at all unusual for raw totals to be corrected. Sometimes those corrections can result in a downward revision. Sorry to be contrary, but this proves absolutely nothing. I very much doubt whether there will ever be “proof” that the election was rigged, but I do agree the huge numbers for Ahmadinejad in his opponents’ home towns seem improbable.
45,000 votes disappearing is common-ground for vote counting? Where are you from? Zimbabwe?
to sanityinjection:
I was a candidate in a very close election in ’96 when the recount occurred each of our count increased but I ended up with just one more vote than my opponent (we started with him in the lead by 4). Generally a recount finds more votes not less.
I also served on the election committee in my township-I know a little about elections.
Arabs countries’ elections reminds me of American baseball. Everyone cheats, everyone knows, yet everyone are surprised every time it happens.
Oy vey.
What a sweeping statement to make about 26 countries. That’s what ignorance is. Also, ignorance is not knowing that Iran in not an arab country.
I’d rather cheat than kill.
Thought there were 23, but obviously, we don’t count the same way.
Kill? Who kills?
To the Iranian people and all others from the Middle East with whom our “political” relations are poor –
Please know that the American people stand with you in this time and WE SUPPORT YOU even if the President does not say so. WE ARE WITH YOU in spirit and we are praying for ALL OF YOU. America does not hate Iran, and Americans do not hate Iranians! The people support the people, not the governments.
ALLAHU AKBAR IRAN!
Wow, I am not used to such a nice comment. That’s real nice!
It needed saying! I hope u are following Twitter and you see that America is rallying for you! There are protests and marches even here! I myself am wearing green in support of you all. It is time that PEOPLE understand that the government does not speak for all of us! I know that Ahmadinejad does not say the words that the person on the street in Tehran would say, and Obama (and certainly not Bush before him!) has not said words that I would say.
Men who are in power do what they must to stay in power. This means that Obama will not speak to say the election is a sham. Other men not in power will try to seize power; this means that McCain and the others who just weeks ago wanted to attack Iran are now suddenly saying that we must act in support of the Iranian people.
You and I have a luxury – we have no power other than our words. And my words to you are that I love you, and I support you, and I pray for your safety and your success.
ALLAHU AKBAR.
[...] or so, they are the platform and are predominant. Secondly, 2 recent posts that were very popular (this and this) and an old one that keeps bringing in people everyday (this). Thirdly, the mentions on [...]
I hope there isn’t any more bloodshed. Let freedom ring!
Needless to say, The Iranian system is a good moral system, but there are forces hell bent on destroying the social fabric and order under foreign influences.
[...] http://loft965.com/2009/06/17/picture-that-proves-iran-election-rigging/ [...]
The more you count the number of actual ballots cast for a candidate would go up even if a percentage goes down. You all are attending college right? Even if a candidate doesn’t get one more vote he doesn’t loose those that he already had.
I am praying for the brave souls who are out there in the streets. May God be with you and keep you safe and may freedom ring for the Iranian people.
I think Ahmadenijad is a lot better than Mousavi, Has everyone forgotten the atrocities Mousavi took part in from 1979-1989? It is sad how quickly people can forget and be fooled by a mask-in this case an alleged Liberal Mask. I mean seriously…he was an extreme radical, there is no way he is suddenly a liberal now.
The problem isn’t the leadership, the problem is the entire system. While I believe that Ahmadenijad is the lesser of the two evils, neither he nor Mousavi can make the changes that are needed in Iran. The youth are revolting for a reason, compare the stark difference between their lives and the lives of youths in the Western world. It is dramatic. This is cultural as well as religious. This is an issue the President- who has no real power in Iran-cannot solve.
The only way to get by this is to get rid of the Supreme leader, maybe then Iran can see real reform and justice.
My most recent blog entry is on this matter if anyone is interested ^.^
May God be with all the people that are risking their lives in the streeet of Tehran.
Revolution is a solution…
Hi I like that post…..I hope the election is Fair….
The unfortunate truth is that the election is a sideshow of puppetry where the theocratic clerics still run the store.
You have to kill the head to stop the beast.
Its difficult to photoshop a live broadcast… I am a bit surprised that they did not think of this when they decided to (probably) rig the election. Its a sad day when the people are not given the chance to decide who they want to run their country – but did any of us really expect the current leadership to give up their power?
Its a matter of time before such an administration meets its fate, but unfortunately there will be much bloodshed and unrest before the people of Iran are allowed to be free(ish).
[...] Como é? Junho 18, 2009 Posted by claudio in Uncategorized. trackback Votação que diminui? [...]
Will this be the next revolution…
On a lighter note, I made a short film about how brown guys have no game,
“Samir’s 30 Days”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2tNwc6YWwJk
Check it out!
Get ready America,,,your closer to this happening in your country than you think
I don’t doubt that the fix was in, but television reports get numbers wrong all the time… Either way, I hope things turn out for the best and freedom and a free vote reigns. Do they have such a thing as a recount or re-vote in Iran? Or would they even allow that?
[...] Picture’s Worth Thousands of Votes Blogger Loft965 offers proof that the Iranian elections were rigged: “Two screenshots Iranian state-run television illustrating the apparent decrease in votes for [...]
The Bulgarian people supports the brotherly Iranian people against the distatorship there. Good luck!
Peace to the country of Iran, and its people, and we , the people, stand in solidarity with your right to exercise your own sense of destiny. Iran is looking like a great nation fighting for liberty is the way and will of its great people.
God bless you!
US Citizen
Those gosh darn hanging chads!
12stepgolf, no sadly, as evidenced by some of the posts, many are without H.S. Degrees…
Unfortunately, when you look at the reality of the situation, and the situation is that it was a third place by a long shot candidate, this matters not. Extrapolation and what is probably more realistic, a doctored photo uploaded by people fomenting uncertainty.
The real matter at hand is that having a vote in a Theocracy is not a step towards TRUE DEMOCRACY as many naive people think. A vote is a way of giving the people the “feeling” of a say, especially in the Iranian context when there are NO DEMOCRATIC institutions: a vote is not rigged when your candidate doesn’t win.
I agree. There is more to democracy than a mere vote and especially one where is was rigged from the beginning.
There is this attitude that people cannot live without a government telling them how to, the larger populations get the more control government wants to exercise on its people.
The basic laws of thou shall not kill, steal should be enough to keep a society civil. Here in the states we won’t even be able to sneeze before to long without having to pay a tax on that.
Control and power by anyone who takes our God given gift of freedom and choice is only working for its own survival, but human nature will not accept that for long. This thing called “for the common good” isn’t good and it cannot be common.
I am ranting and this is not the place for my discontent, accept my apology.
I do hope that what is happening in Iran is an inspiration for all people who seek true freedom and liberty from all oppressive governements-including the land of the “free and the brave”.
[...] http://loft965.com/2009/06/17/picture-that-proves-iran-election-rigging/ [...]
many of us don’t even understand the counting process over there … counting … verifying .. how many level do they have .. and at which point of a count did the media took the numbers … their sources???
Only the people of Iran knows … all the best!!!
The same thing has happened here in the States. Nothing new. Especially losing in home states. In Ron Paul’s home district primary, 12,000 voted, 10,000 voted for Paul for representative and 2,000 for his neocon opponent (who raised millions against him), then supposedly only 2,000 vote for Paul in the presidential race, 10,000 for McCain. So basically at a minimum you’d have to believe that 8,000 Paul voters switched to vote for McCain.
Or you could believe that DieBold, which changed their name to “Premier Election Solutions” after their senior executive got caught and arrested for dozens of counts of writing backdoors in software at a seperate company, might just be writing backdoors for their voting software as well.
The second largest electronic voting company would be ES&S. ES&S’s CEO was a little known man by the name of Chuck Hagel, now US Senator.
Hagel ran against a POPULAR governor and won in a “landslide” when he was expected to overwhelmingly lose. Over 80% of the vote was counted on his company’s ES&S machines, and he failed to disclose his position as CEO of the company in his mandated disclosures prior to the election. No investigation of his failure to disclose and the possible voter fraud ever occurred.
There is a reason our media is not quick to claim Iran is rigging the vote: because we rig our own and don’t want to bring any undue attention to how easy it is to rig elections.
Planet Earth, where politicians lie, votes are rigged, and the populace at large dumbed down with fast food, mercury-filled vaccines, fluoride-filled water, elite-controlled television, and a sense of “nationalism” that encourages them to be blind to their government’s abuses.
[...] scrubone 11:14 pm WordPress’ top post right now features this picture, which apparently shows the local canditate’s vote going down [...]
Thank s for support – متشکریم از اینکه ما را حمایت می کنید
No one can impose good things of people. People of Iran should have the liberty to choose their own government.
I have a few simple questions that I don’t know has either been asked or answered. Was there any statement from Iranian television, or the council or anyone when this was going on about the curious drop in Votes for Rezaee, and if so to whom those votes went?
A screenshot, while a valuable resource, can’t tell the entire story, can it? Are there other screen shots around from earlier, or later that have similar jumps in numbers? I’m curious and looking for information.
[...] Another picture of the vote fraud 2009 June 18 tags: Ahmadinejad, Iran, Iran protests, Iranian presidential election, Musavi, Rezai by TML The picture from Iranian State TV shows that at 9:47, Rezai had 633,048 votes and at 13:53, he had 587,913 votes. In a span of 4 hours and 6 minutes, Rezai’s vote total had decreased by 45,135. From Loft965: [...]
[...] “Picture Proves Iran Election Rigging“ Published in: [...]
[...] but either they aren’t on youtube, or more likely, I just cannot find them. I did however run into a spot here on wordpress that shows a 45,000 vote drop for one of the minority candidates, and makes that [...]
I don´t buy it. what about Bush-Gore elections? is the USA a democracy?
well, I mean…why is everyone so eager to point fingers at a rigged election, when it happened to US….TWICE? It seems like people are so eager to worry about problems in other countries because it takes their mind off the problems in our own? :\
[...] If you’re a facebook user, you may want to join this group – it’s set up by a friend of mine, and he’s got some fascinating links on it, including this rather damning picture. [...]
This what happen…
You might want to take a look at this.
http://helpiranelection.com/
Rigging elections is like breathing to politicians. Involuntary and necessary. The will of the people is a joke, and always has been. Democracy is merely the best system for making the populace complacent while they get screwed. In Democracy, the most efficient liars win. At least in a Monarchy you may get inefficient, guileless tyrants, rather than the cunning tricksters present in Democracy. Heck, every now and then a Monarchy actually produces a good leader, since some people are simply born with a caring soul.
In Democracy, we just shoot our leaders if they have a heart (JFK, RFK, RIP) or their plane mysteriously crashes/is shot down (JFK Jr, Paul Wellstone, Larry McDonald, RIP).
As an Iranian living in Iran, I have so many things to say, but i just can’t stop my tears. Except some of u, how can u people talk about this like that???? They’re killing my people in the streets of my town, and u just say this is not the proof, that is not the proof, the democracy isn’t that, they’re just angry because they lost and so on…….
There are thousand of proofs that the hole thing was a fraud. Even scientific, mathematical and statistical proofs.
To clear some cases here i have to say that YES, Iran’s tv and the IRINN actually ARE state organizations and the photos aren’t photoshop’d. I have seen this on my own tv screen.
To Soraya i have to say: well, i have nothing to say about Mousavi, but as u see Ahmadi.N. is doing horrible atrocities too. So how can u say he’s better?
And at last, someone with the ID: Pahlavi! U r right, but i have to remind u that in the Pahlavi regime, we even didn’t have this!
Not surprised in the least
[...] Picture that proves Iran election rigging Next time they try to fool the people they better not be fools themselves. How can someone’s votes dip while [...] [...]
[...] Original post [...]
The vote was probably screwy. I don’t doubt it. And the violence in Iran is DEFINITELY REAL.
The question here is did Mousavi win. And on that question I see no evidence that he did and much evidence to the contrary. As much as the heavily propagandized west likes to hate Ahmadinejad, he is not unpopular inside Iran. Twits and blogs by the sliver of the Iranian upper class don’t change that fact. This seems to be something the US middle and upper middle class of net users have a hard time accepting.
Which isn’t surprising considering the way the digital divide skews public political opinion in this country. The poor don’t twit or blog much so watching and reading the net you would have a skewed view of US politics as well. I think that is what we are seeing in Iran. Not a stolen election.
I have been closely following the updates on the Iran Election and I really can empathise with the people of Iran. Elections are meant for the people to choose their representative and in this case, it seems it was all just a hogwash. The demostrations and the protests have really brought the world take a notice about this injustice. The firing on the protesters brought back the ugly memories of the chinese tiananmen square.
Down with the dictator..!! Its time, the ‘NEW PRESIDENT’ – Mahmoud Ahmadinejad steps down and gave Democracy a chance, it truly deserves.
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/thepoorpeoplescampaign7
http://poorpeoplescampaignppc.org/
MY PEOPLE’S YOU ALL MUST KEEP STANDING UP AS ONE FOR TOGETHER WE HAVE POWER
its great.you are forign and follow iran news.
this election was a big cheat.
Mousavi ro esghe(love)
im iranian.
Iran’s 12-year old candidate: No Isreal, no computer games, no working women
[...] post by loft965 and software by Elliott Back Categories: Whats Hot On Twitter Tags: Comments (0) [...]
In the U.S. presidential election of 2000, Al Gore did not win his home state of Tennessee.
k
when is everyone going to wake up and realise the whole world is corrupt, has been since day one. Its all about the Benjamins (money). Check out Zeitgeistmovie.com hopefully it will open you mind. I’m by no means condoning Iranian election, certainly believe it was rigged. But I am by no means surprised, in fact kinda happy, hopefully the world’s scandals that involve us all will finally be exposed.
9/11 was a inside job. 2008 presidential election was rigged. The worst American economic depression since the Great Depression its self was rigged, in a attempt for the government to take control. Socialism here we come…..Unless we stand up and believe that we can make a difference…….
[...] Picture that proves Iran election rigging « LOFT965 [...]
We are one human family and we have to care about the people of Iran. Whether we share the same religion with them or not we have to realize that they are our brothers and sisters. When on group of people is suffering we all suffer.
I give my prayers and support to you as your fight for your rights! May God bless you all and keep you safe in this time of uncertainty!
I am American but my heart is in Iran at this time. I pray that you are victorious in your battle for freedom. Freedom is a basic human right and no man or woman should be denied this. I am praying for all of you and for Iran.
[...] Picture that proves Iran election rigging « LOFT965 Next time they try to fool the people they better not be fools themselves. How can someone’s votes dip while counting. And how can all the candidates lose in their home states. For those of you that don’t understand these numbers: then you can read the times on the upper screen and lower. The third candidates votes decreased while counting. Spread it around! [...]
From the Netherlands with love-Freedom feels fantastic
thought you were legit for a while but now i see you rejecting support of revolution from conservative americans and that you are another obama worshiping child. bye bye
well, if you stand with any kind of conservative then good riddance
Your site extraordinarily excellent. The fact is showed with evidence.
Do follow me @HabibOne on twitter